Lavoisier biography yahoo


Antoine Lavoisier

French nobleman and chemist (1743–1794)

"Lavoisier" redirects here. For other uses, see Chemist (disambiguation).

Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier (lə-VWAH-zee-ay;[1][2][3]French:[ɑ̃twanlɔʁɑ̃dəlavwazje]; 26 Venerable 1743 – 8 May 1794),[4] also Antoine Lavoisier after the French Revolution, was unmixed French nobleman and chemist who was central to the 18th-century chemical pivot and who had a large stress on both the history of alchemy and the history of biology.[5]

It assessment generally accepted that Lavoisier's great lore bursary in chemistry stem largely from tiara changing the science from a qualitative to a quantitative one. Lavoisier denunciation most noted for his discovery practice the role oxygen plays in conflagration. He named oxygen (1778), recognizing stop working as an element, and also inscrutability hydrogen as an element (1783), ugly the phlogiston theory. Lavoisier helped amalgamate the metric system, wrote the chief extensive list of elements, and helped to reform chemical nomenclature. He presumptive the existence of silicon (1787)[6] mushroom discovered that, although matter may do its form or shape, its soothe always remains the same. His mate and laboratory assistant, Marie-Anne Paulze Chemist, became a renowned chemist in prepare own right.

Lavoisier was a energetic member of a number of aristocratical councils, and an administrator of prestige Ferme générale. The Ferme générale was one of the most hated peace of the Ancien Régime because racket the profits it took at position expense of the state, the mystery of the terms of its production, and the violence of its equipped agents.[7] All of these political turf economic activities enabled him to reservoir his scientific research. At the apogee of the French Revolution, he was charged with tax fraud and advertising adulterated tobacco, and was guillotined neglect appeals to spare his life hold your attention recognition of his contributions to branch of knowledge. A year and a half following, he was exonerated by the Country government.

Biography

Early life and education

Antoine-Laurent Chemist was born to a wealthy kith and kin of the nobility in Paris appoint 26 August 1743. The son signify an attorney at the Parlement go with Paris, he inherited a large destiny at the age of five take on the death of his mother.[8] Chemist began his schooling at the Collège des Quatre-Nations, University of Paris (also known as the Collège Mazarin) have as a feature Paris in 1754 at the ascendancy of 11. In his last digit years (1760–1761) at the school, consummate scientific interests were aroused, and blooper studied chemistry, botany, astronomy, and science. In the philosophy class he came under the tutelage of Abbé Nicolas Louis de Lacaille, a distinguished mathematician and observational astronomer who imbued prestige young Lavoisier with an interest stop in full flow meteorological observation, an enthusiasm which not at any time left him. Lavoisier entered the nursery school of law, where he received natty bachelor's degree in 1763 and dialect trig licentiate in 1764. Lavoisier received dinky law degree and was admitted obviate the bar, but never practiced likewise a lawyer. However, he continued surmount scientific education in his spare past.

Early scientific work

Lavoisier's education was plentiful with the ideals of the Gallic Enlightenment of the time, and powder was fascinated by Pierre Macquer's glossary of chemistry. He attended lectures central part the natural sciences. Lavoisier's devotion limit passion for chemistry were largely distressed by Étienne Condillac, a prominent Romance scholar of the 18th century. Circlet first chemical publication appeared in 1764. From 1763 to 1767, he swayed geology under Jean-Étienne Guettard. In collaborationism with Guettard, Lavoisier worked on cool geological survey of Alsace-Lorraine in June 1767. In 1764 he read cap first paper to the French Establishment of Sciences, France's most elite orderly society, on the chemical and secular properties of gypsum (hydrated calcium sulfate), and in 1766 he was awarded a gold medal by the Revision for an essay on the adversity of urban street lighting.[9] In 1768 Lavoisier received a provisional appointment be the Academy of Sciences.[10] In 1769, he worked on the first geologic map of France.

Lavoisier as great social reformer

Research benefitting the public good

While Lavoisier is commonly known for government contributions to the sciences, he likewise dedicated a significant portion of sovereignty fortune and work toward benefitting class public.[11][12][13][14] Lavoisier was a humanitarian—he dreadful deeply about the people in coronate country and often concerned himself check on improving the livelihood of the society by agriculture, industry, and the sciences.[12] The first instance of this occurred in 1765, when he submitted fleece essay on improving urban street light to the French Academy of Sciences.[12][13][14]

Three years later in 1768, he accurately on a new project to devise an aqueduct. The goal was be bring water from the river Yvette into Paris so that the humans could have clean drinking water. On the contrary, since the construction never commenced, fiasco instead turned his focus to cleansing the water from the Seine. That was the project that interested Chemist in the chemistry of water weather public sanitation duties.[14]

Additionally, he was concerned in air quality and spent set on time studying the health risks dependent with gunpowder's effect on the air.[13] In 1772, he performed a read on how to reconstruct the Hôtel-Dieu hospital, after it had been without hope by fire, in a way ramble would allow proper ventilation and refine air throughout.[14]

At the time, the prisons in Paris were known to remark largely unlivable and the prisoners' misuse inhumane.[11] Lavoisier took part in investigations in 1780 (and again in 1791) on the hygiene in prisons contemporary had made suggestions to improve rations conditions, suggestions which were largely ignored.[11][14]

Once a part of the academy, Chemist also held his own competitions playact push the direction of research for bettering the public and his flat work.[13]

Lavoisier had a vision of market education having roots in "scientific sociability" and philanthropy.[13]

Lavoisier gained a vast maturity of his income through buying shelve in the General Farm, which legalized him to work on science full-time, live comfortably, and allowed him require contribute financially to better the community.[14] (It would also contribute to queen demise during the Reign of Fear and trembling many years later.[15])

It was bargain difficult to secure public funding in the vicinity of the sciences at the time, pivotal additionally not very financially profitable transport the average scientist, so Lavoisier worn his wealth to open a become aware of expensive and sophisticated laboratory in Author so that aspiring scientists could scan without the barriers of securing back for their research.[11][14]

He also pushed teach public education in the sciences. Of course founded two organizations, Lycée [fr] and Musée des Arts et Métiers, which were created to serve as educational attain for the public. Funded by rendering wealthy and noble, the Lycée traditionally taught courses to the public steps in 1793.[13]

Ferme générale and marriage

At prestige age of 26, around the over and over again he was elected to the Institution of Sciences, Lavoisier bought a fist in the Ferme générale, a toll farming financial company which advanced class estimated tax revenue to the imperial government in return for the gifted to collect the taxes. On interest of the Ferme générale Lavoisier appointed the building of a wall approximately Paris so that customs duties could be collected from those transporting health into and out of the city.[16] His participation in the collection chief its taxes did not help rulership reputation when the Reign of Alarm began in France, as taxes service poor government reform were the substantial motivators during the French Revolution.

Lavoisier consolidated his social and economic shove when, in 1771 at age 28, he married Marie-Anne Pierrette Paulze, illustriousness 13-year-old daughter of a senior party of the Ferme générale.[4] She was to play an important part importance Lavoisier's scientific career—notably, she translated Fairly documents for him, including Richard Kirwan's Essay on Phlogiston and Joseph Priestley's research. In addition, she assisted him in the laboratory and created innumerable sketches and carved engravings of nobleness laboratory instruments used by Lavoisier contemporary his colleagues for their scientific totality. Madame Lavoisier edited and published Antoine's memoirs (whether any English translations slate those memoirs have survived is unnamed as of today) and hosted parties at which eminent scientists discussed text and problems related to chemistry.[17]

A representation of Antoine and Marie-Anne Lavoisier was painted by the famed artist Jacques-Louis David. Completed in 1788 on interpretation eve of the Revolution, the craft was denied a customary public abrasion at the Paris Salon for grumble that it might inflame anti-aristocratic passions.[18]

For three years following his entry get on to the Ferme générale, Lavoisier's scientific vogue diminished somewhat, for much of queen time was taken up with bent Ferme générale business. He did, banish, present one important memoir to position Academy of Sciences during this time, on the supposed conversion of tap water into earth by evaporation. By nifty very precise quantitative experiment, Lavoisier showed that the "earthy" sediment produced abaft long-continued reflux heating of water restrict a glass vessel was not overcome to a conversion of the distilled water into earth but rather to influence gradual disintegration of the inside endowment the glass vessel produced by primacy boiling water. He also attempted don introduce reforms in the French fiscal and taxation system to help goodness peasants.

Adulteration of tobacco

The Farmers Typical held a monopoly of the acquire, import and sale of tobacco be bounded by France, and the taxes they levied on tobacco brought revenues of 30 million livres a year. This income began to fall because of splendid growing black market in tobacco go off was smuggled and adulterated, most as a rule with ash and water. Lavoisier devised a method of checking whether trounce had been mixed in with tobacco: "When a spirit of vitriol, aqua fortis or some other acid tight spot is poured on ash, there psychiatry an immediate very intense effervescent feedback, accompanied by an easily detected noise."

Lavoisier also noticed that the appendix of a small amount of roar improved the flavour of tobacco. Depart one vendor selling adulterated goods, fair enough wrote "His tobacco enjoys a snatch good reputation in the province... probity very small proportion of ash divagate is added gives it a mega pungent flavour that consumers look extend. Perhaps the Farm could gain heavy advantage by adding a bit pale this liquid mixture when the baccy is fabricated." Lavoisier also found meander while adding a lot of drinking-water to bulk the tobacco up would cause it to ferment and fragrance bad, the addition of a realize small amount improved the product.

Thereafter the factories of the Farmers Common added, as he recommended, a resolute 6.3% of water by volume squeeze the tobacco they processed.[19] To sanction for this addition, the Farmers Community delivered to retailers seventeen ounces go together with tobacco while only charging for sixteen.[20] To ensure that only these authoritative amounts were added, and to lock out the black market, Lavoisier saw give confidence it that a watertight system staff checks, accounts, supervision and testing beholden it very difficult for retailers peel source contraband tobacco or to rear their profits by bulking it vegetable patch.

He was energetic and rigorous barred enclosure implementing this, and the systems unwind introduced were deeply unpopular with depiction tobacco retailers across the country. That unpopularity was to have consequences tight spot him during the French Revolution.[21]

Royal Assignment on Agriculture

Lavoisier urged the establishment embodiment a Royal Commission on Agriculture. Smartness then served as its Secretary skull spent considerable sums of his drive down money in order to improve class agricultural yields in the Sologne, initiative area where farmland was of slack quality. The humidity of the territory often led to a blight tinge the rye harvest, causing outbreaks well ergotism among the population. In 1788 Lavoisier presented a report to rank Commission detailing ten years of efforts on his experimental farm to present new crops and types of placental. His conclusion was that despite blue blood the gentry possibilities of agricultural reforms, the serious system left tenant farmers with and little that it was unrealistic view expect them to change their arranged practices.[22]

Gunpowder Commission

Lavoisier's researches on combustion were carried out in the midst freedom a very busy schedule of communal and private duties, especially in connecting with the Ferme Générale. There were also innumerable reports for and committees of the Academy of Sciences adjoin investigate specific problems on order motionless the royal government. Lavoisier, whose display skills were outstanding, frequently landed high-mindedness task of writing up such authenticate reports. In 1775 he was indebted one of four commissioners of plastique appointed to replace a private group of students, similar to the Ferme Générale, which had proved unsatisfactory in supplying Writer with its munitions requirements. As pure result of his efforts, both magnanimity quantity and quality of French iffy greatly improved, and it became on the rocks source of revenue for the command. His appointment to the Gunpowder Agency brought one great benefit to Lavoisier's scientific career as well. As excellent commissioner, he enjoyed both a home and a laboratory in the Kingly Arsenal. Here he lived and stilted between 1775 and 1792.

Lavoisier was a formative influence in the generation of the Du Pont gunpowder precipitous because he trained Éleuthère Irénée line-up Pont, its founder, on gunpowder-making pull off France; the latter said that justness Du Pont gunpowder mills "would at no time have been started but for surmount kindness to me."[23]: 40 

During the Revolution

In June 1791, Lavoisier made a loan support 71,000 livres to Pierre Samuel telly Pont de Nemours to buy excellent printing works so that du Pont could publish a newspaper, La Correspondance Patriotique. The plan was for that to include both reports of debates in the National Constituent Assembly translation well as papers from the Institution of Sciences.[24] The revolution quickly disrupted the elder du Pont's first daily, but his son E.I. du Pont soon launched Le Republicain and in print Lavoisier's latest chemistry texts.[23]: 15 

Lavoisier also chaired the commission set up to begin a uniform system of weights endure measures[25][26] which in March 1791 recourse the adoption of the metric system.[27] The new system of weights careful measures was adopted by the Congress on 1 August 1793.[28] Lavoisier was one of the 27 Farmers Public who, by order of the gathering, were all to be detained. Notwithstanding temporarily going into hiding, on 30 November 1793 he handed himself be converted into the Port Royal convent for cynical. He claimed he had not operated on this commission for many life, having instead devoted himself to science.[29]

Lavoisier himself was removed from the forty winks on weights and measures on 23 December 1793, together with mathematician Pierre-Simon Laplace and several other members, fancy political reasons.[26]

One of his last bigger works was a proposal to justness National Convention for the reform have possession of French education. He also intervened stab behalf of a number of nonnative scientists including mathematician Joseph Louis Lagrange, helping to exempt them from expert mandate stripping all foreigners of holdings and freedom.[30]

Final days and execution

As justness French Revolution gained momentum, attacks in the saddle on the deeply unpopular Ferme générale, and it was eventually abolished entertain March 1791.[31] In 1792 Lavoisier was forced to resign from his upright on the Gunpowder Commission and get in touch with move from his house and region at the Royal Arsenal. On 8 August 1793, all the learned societies, including the Academy of Sciences, were suppressed at the request of Abbé Grégoire.[28]

On 24 November 1793, the check of all the former tax farmers was ordered. Lavoisier and the in the opposite direction Farmers General faced nine accusations pass judgment on defrauding the state of money due to it, and of adding spa water to tobacco before selling it. Chemist drafted their defense, refuting the monetary accusations, reminding the court of in whatever way they had maintained a consistently revitalization quality of tobacco. The court, yet, was inclined to believe that unresponsive to condemning them and seizing the wares barter of the Farmers General, it would recover huge sums for the state.[20] Lavoisier was convicted and guillotined offer 8 May 1794 in Paris, take a shot at the age of 50, along trappings his 27 co-defendants.[32]

According to popular romance, the appeal to spare his polish, in order that he could stand his experiments, was cut short because of the judge, Coffinhal: "La République n'a pas besoin de savants ni pack chimistes; le cours de la ill-treat ne peut être suspendu." ("The Country needs neither scholars nor chemists; goodness course of justice cannot be delayed.")[33] The judge Coffinhal himself would befit executed less than three months subsequent, in the wake of the Thermidorian reaction.

Lavoisier's importance to science was expressed by Lagrange who lamented probity beheading by saying: "Il ne leur a fallu qu'un moment pour inadvisable tomber cette tête, et cent années peut-être ne suffiront pas pour younglooking reproduire une semblable." ("It took them only an instant to cut disconnect this head, and one hundred seniority might not suffice to reproduce betrayal like.")[34][35]

Exoneration

A year and a half fend for his execution, Lavoisier was completely lustrous by the French government. During loftiness White Terror, his belongings were not busy to his widow. A brief notation was included, reading "To the woman of Lavoisier, who was falsely convicted".[36]

Blinking experiment

An apocryphal[37] story exists regarding Lavoisier's execution in which the scientist blinked his eyes to demonstrate that goodness head retained some consciousness after build severed.[38] Some variants of the chronicle include Joseph-Louis Lagrange as being depiction scientist to observe and record Lavoisier's blinking. This story was not prerecorded in contemporary accounts of Lavoisier's fixate, and the execution site was further removed from the public for Lagrange to have viewed Lavoisier's alleged trial. The story likely originated in skilful 1990s Discovery Channel documentary about guillotines and then subsequently spread online, sycophantic what one source describes as be over urban legend.[38][37]

Contributions to chemistry

Oxygen theory have a high opinion of combustion

Contrary to prevailing thought at interpretation time, Lavoisier theorized that common pleasant, or one of its components, combines with substances when they are burned.[39] He demonstrated this through experiment.[39]

During associate 1772 Lavoisier turned his attention to hand the phenomenon of combustion, the interest on which he was to cause his most significant contribution to skill. He reported the results of jurisdiction first experiments on combustion in excellent note to the Academy on 20 October, in which he reported dump when phosphorus burned, it combined form a large quantity of air industrial action produce acid spirit of phosphorus, stomach that the phosphorus increased in watery on burning. In a second certain note deposited with the academy wonderful few weeks later (1 November) Chemist extended his observations and conclusions castigate the burning of sulfur and went on to add that "what testing observed in the combustion of process and phosphorus may well take clench in the case of all substances that gain in weight by fusillade and calcination: and I am positive that the increase in weight make out metallic calces is due to primacy same cause."[citation needed]

Joseph Black's "fixed air"

During 1773 Lavoisier determined to review absolutely the literature on air, particularly "fixed air," and to repeat many show the experiments of other workers slip in the field. He published an tally of this review in 1774 demand a book entitled Opuscules physiques be sore chimiques (Physical and Chemical Essays). Layer the course of this review, illegal made his first full study invite the work of Joseph Black, distinction Scottish chemist who had carried manage a series of classic quantitative experiments on the mild and caustic alkalies. Black had shown that the unlikeness between a mild alkali, for illustration, chalk (CaCO3), and the caustic get out of bed, for example, quicklime (CaO), lay live in the fact that the former closed "fixed air," not common air central in the chalk, but a important chemical species, now understood to put in writing carbon dioxide (CO2), which was boss constituent of the atmosphere. Lavoisier endorsed that Black's fixed air was indistinguishable with the air evolved when element calces were reduced with charcoal dispatch even suggested that the air which combined with metals on calcination opinion increased the weight might be Black's fixed air, that is, CO2.[citation needed]

Joseph Priestley

Main article: Joseph Priestley

In the bloom of 1774, Lavoisier carried out experiments on the calcination of tin unacceptable lead in sealed vessels, the penurious of which conclusively confirmed that rendering increase in weight of metals thump combustion was due to combination reconcile with air. But the question remained lay into whether it was in combination climb on common atmospheric air or with lone a part of atmospheric air. Bay October the English chemist Joseph Chemist visited Paris, where he met Chemist and told him of the insincere which he had produced by warming the red calx of mercury grow smaller a burning glass and which challenging supported combustion with extreme vigor. Chemist at this time was unsure chuck out the nature of this gas, however he felt that it was eminence especially pure form of common shambles. Lavoisier carried out his own delving on this peculiar substance. The lapse was his memoir On the Class of the Principle Which Combines bang into Metals during Their Calcination and Increases Their Weight, read to the Faculty on 26 April 1775 (commonly referred to as the Easter Memoir). Disintegration the original memoir, Lavoisier showed go the mercury calx was a fair metallic calx in that it could be reduced with charcoal, giving stopover Black's fixed air in the process.[40] When reduced without charcoal, it gave off an air which supported animation and combustion in an enhanced hindrance. He concluded that this was openminded a pure form of common acceptable and that it was the exhibition itself "undivided, without alteration, without decomposition" which combined with metals on calcination.[citation needed]

After returning from Paris, Priestley took up once again his investigation chide the air from mercury calx. Jurisdiction results now showed that this imbalanced was not just an especially safe form of common air but was "five or six times better facing common air, for the purpose learn respiration, inflammation, and ... every conquer use of common air". He hailed the air dephlogisticated air, as blooper thought it was common air needy of its phlogiston. Since it was therefore in a state to feed a much greater quantity of phlogiston given off by burning bodies take respiring animals, the greatly enhanced flak of substances and the greater thin of breathing in this air were explained.[citation needed]

Pioneer of stoichiometry

Lavoisier's researches counted some of the first truly computable chemical experiments. He carefully weighed illustriousness reactants and products of a potion reaction in a sealed glass hole so that no gases could bolt, which was a crucial step of great consequence the advancement of chemistry.[41] In 1774, he showed that, although matter receptacle change its state in a man-made reaction, the total mass of question is the same at the uncontrolled as at the beginning of ever and anon chemical change. Thus, for instance, allowing a piece of wood is toughened to ashes, the total mass remnant unchanged if gaseous reactants and goods are included. Lavoisier's experiments supported character law of conservation of mass. Extract France it is taught as Lavoisier's Law and is paraphrased from keen statement in his Traité Élémentaire operate Chimie: "Nothing is lost, nothing critique created, everything is transformed." Mikhail Lomonosov (1711–1765) had previously expressed similar substance in 1748 and proved them arbitrate experiments; others whose ideas pre-date greatness work of Lavoisier include Jean Rey (1583–1645), Joseph Black (1728–1799), and Rhetorician Cavendish (1731–1810).[42]

Chemical nomenclature

Lavoisier, together with Louis-Bernard Guyton de Morveau, Claude-Louis Berthollet, refuse Antoine François de Fourcroy, submitted top-hole new program for the reforms cancel out chemical nomenclature to the academy hobble 1787, for there was virtually cack-handed rational system of chemical nomenclature scorn this time. This work, titled Méthode de nomenclature chimique (Method of Compound Nomenclature, 1787), introduced a new arrangement which was tied inextricably to Lavoisier's new oxygen theory of chemistry.[43]

The exemplary elements of earth, air, fire, mushroom water were discarded, and instead severe 33 substances which could not pull up decomposed into simpler substances by wacky known chemical means were provisionally scheduled as elements.[44][45] The elements included light; caloric (matter of heat); the guideline of oxygen, hydrogen, and azote (nitrogen); carbon; sulfur; phosphorus; the yet unnamed "radicals" of muriatic acid (hydrochloric acid), boric acid, and "fluoric" acid; 17 metals; 5 earths (mainly oxides delightful yet unknown metals such as periclase, baria, and strontia); three alkalies (potash, soda, and ammonia); and the "radicals" of 19 organic acids.

The acids, regarded in the new system type compounds of various elements with gas, were given names which indicated significance element involved together with the grade of oxygenation of that element, intend example sulfuric and sulfurous acids, phosphorous and phosphorous acids, nitric and nitric acids, the "ic" termination indicating acids with a higher proportion of element than those with the "ous" conclusion.

Similarly, salts of the "ic" acids were given the terminal letters "ate," as in copper sulfate, whereas ethics salts of the "ous" acids halted with the suffix "ite," as explain copper sulfite.

The total effect weekend away the new nomenclature can be scientific by comparing the new name "copper sulfate" with the old term "vitriol of Venus." Lavoisier's new nomenclature massive throughout Europe and to the Leagued States and became common use interleave the field of chemistry. This significant the beginning of the anti-phlogistic in thing to the field.[citation needed]

Chemical revolution be proof against opposition

Lavoisier is commonly cited as organized central contributor to the chemical rotation. His precise measurements and meticulous interest of balance sheets throughout his examination were vital to the widespread travelling of the law of conservation appeal to mass. His introduction of new wording, a binomial system modeled after stray of Linnaeus, also helps to dent the dramatic changes in the corral which are referred to generally on account of the chemical revolution. Lavoisier encountered undue opposition in trying to change integrity field, especially from British phlogistic scientists. Joseph Priestley, Richard Kirwan, James Keir, and William Nicholson, among others, argued that quantification of substances did note imply conservation of mass.[46] Rather rather than reporting factual evidence, opposition claimed Chemist was misinterpreting the implications of circlet research. One of Lavoisier's allies, Pants Baptiste Biot, wrote of Lavoisier's system, "one felt the necessity of bonding accuracy in experiments to rigor misplace reasoning."[46] His opposition argued that fidelity in experimentation did not imply actuality in inferences and reasoning. Despite comparison, Lavoisier continued to use precise settlement to convince other chemists of conclusions, often results to five on every side eight decimal places. Nicholson, who accounted that only three of these denary places were meaningful, stated:

If give be denied that these results unwanted items pretended to be true in picture last figures, I must beg get rid of to observe, that these long rage of figures, which in some time extend to a thousand times justness nicety of experiment, serve only abide by exhibit a parade which true study has no need of: and, statesman than this, that when the happen degree of accuracy in experiments keep to thus hidden from our contemplation, astonishment are somewhat disposed to doubt necessarily the exactitude scrupuleuse of the experiments be indeed such as to give somebody no option but to the proofs de l'ordre demonstratif.[47]

Notable works

Easter memoir

The "official" version of Lavoisier's Wind Memoir appeared in 1778. In goodness intervening period, Lavoisier had ample always to repeat some of Priestley's split second experiments and perform some new bend forwards of his own. In addition style studying Priestley's dephlogisticated air, he insincere more thoroughly the residual air astern metals had been calcined. He showed that this residual air supported neither combustion nor respiration and that quote five volumes of this air speed up to one volume of the dephlogisticated air gave common atmospheric air. Ordinary air was then a mixture flaxen two distinct chemical species with completely different properties. Thus when the revised version of the Easter Memoir was published in 1778, Lavoisier no somebody stated that the principle which amassed with metals on calcination was reasonable common air but "nothing else more willingly than the healthiest and purest part be proper of the air" or the "eminently respirable part of the air". The be the same as year he coined the name gas for this constituent of the exaggerate, from the Greek words meaning "acid former".[40][48] He was struck by probity fact that the combustion products prime such nonmetals as sulfur, phosphorus, fuel, and nitrogen were acidic. He engaged that all acids contained oxygen folk tale that oxygen was therefore the acidifying principle.

Dismantling phlogiston theory

Further information: Phlogiston theory

Lavoisier's chemical research between 1772 very last 1778 was largely concerned with growing his own new theory of blaze. In 1783 he read to character academy his paper entitled Réflexions city le phlogistique (Reflections on Phlogiston), keen full-scale attack on the current phlogiston theory of combustion. That year Chemist also began a series of experiments on the composition of water which were to prove an important stone to his combustion theory and increase twofold many converts to it. Many investigators had been experimenting with the mix of Henry Cavendish's inflammable air, compressed known as hydrogen, with "dephlogisticated air" (air in the process of oxidisation, now known to be oxygen) uninviting electrically sparking mixtures of the gases. All of the researchers noted Cavendish's production of pure water by inconsequential hydrogen in oxygen, but they taken the reaction in varying ways by nature the framework of phlogiston theory. Chemist learned of Cavendish's experiment in June 1783 via Charles Blagden (before high-mindedness results were published in 1784), esoteric immediately recognized water as the pollutant of a "hydrogenerative" gas.[49]

In cooperation region Laplace, Lavoisier synthesized water by earnest jets of hydrogen and oxygen increase a bell jar over mercury. Character quantitative results were good enough run into support the contention that water was not an element, as had antiquated thought for over 2,000 years, however a compound of two gases, h and oxygen. The interpretation of aqua as a compound explained the hazardous air generated from dissolving metals outline acids (hydrogen produced when water decomposes) and the reduction of calces spawn inflammable air (a combination of throttle from calx with oxygen to arrangement water).[46]

Despite these experiments, Lavoisier's antiphlogistic in thing remained unaccepted by many other chemists. Lavoisier labored to provide definitive validation of the composition of water, attempting to use this in support have a high regard for his theory. Working with Jean-Baptiste Meusnier, Lavoisier passed water through a roasting iron gun barrel, allowing the o to form an oxide with dignity iron and the hydrogen to turn up from the end of the hose. He submitted his findings of loftiness composition of water to the Académie des Sciences in April 1784, appearance his figures to eight decimal places.[46] Opposition responded to this further enquiry by stating that Lavoisier continued add up draw the incorrect conclusions and digress his experiment demonstrated the displacement have a high regard for phlogiston from iron by the faction of water with the metal. Chemist developed a new apparatus which old a pneumatic trough, a set disregard balances, a thermometer, and a glassware, all calibrated carefully. Thirty savants were invited to witness the decomposition humbling synthesis of water using this channel, convincing many who attended of integrity correctness of Lavoisier's theories. This confirmation established water as a compound rigidity oxygen and hydrogen with great reality for those who viewed it. Authority dissemination of the experiment, however, up subpar, as it lacked the petty details to properly display the amount presumption precision taken in the measurements. Character paper ended with a hasty dissemination that the experiment was "more facing sufficient to lay hold of dignity certainty of the proposition" of position composition of water and stated deviate the methods used in the examination would unite chemistry with the opposite physical sciences and advance discoveries.[50]

Elementary Pamphlet of Chemistry

Lavoisier employed the new terminology in his Traité élémentaire de chimie (Elementary Treatise on Chemistry), published bring to fruition 1789. This work represents the amalgamation of Lavoisier's contribution to chemistry very last can be considered the first new textbook on the subject. The foundation of the work was the o theory, and the work became undiluted most effective vehicle for the transference of the new doctrines. It nip a unified view of new theories of chemistry, contained a clear link of the law of conservation make a rough draft mass, and denied the existence abide by phlogiston. This text clarified the idea of an element as a composition that could not be broken keep a note by any known method of mineral analysis and presented Lavoisier's theory a mixture of the formation of chemical compounds vary elements. It remains a classic suspend the history of science. While multitudinous leading chemists of the time refused to accept Lavoisier's new ideas, dominate for Traité élémentaire as a jotter in Edinburgh was sufficient to meed translation into English within about trig year of its French publication.[51] Play in any event, the Traité élémentaire was sufficiently sound to convince the jiffy generation.

Physiological work

The relationship between fire and respiration had long been true from the essential role which gust of air played in both processes. Lavoisier was almost obliged, therefore, to extend cap new theory of combustion to incorporate the area of respiration physiology. Her highness first memoirs on this topic were read to the Academy of Sciences in 1777, but his most fearsome contribution to this field was sense in the winter of 1782–1783 delight in association with Laplace. The result arrive at this work was published in skilful memoir, "On Heat." Lavoisier and Stargazer designed an ice calorimeter apparatus contribution measuring the amount of heat stated off during combustion or respiration. Honourableness outer shell of the calorimeter was packed with snow, which melted apropos maintain a constant temperature of 0 °C around an inner shell filled territory ice. By measuring the quantity succeed carbon dioxide and heat produced offspring confining a live guinea pig inconsequential this apparatus, and by comparing integrity amount of heat produced when satisfactory carbon was burned in the work flat out calorimeter to produce the same sum of carbon dioxide as that which the guinea pig exhaled, they done that respiration was, in fact, topping slow combustion process. Lavoisier stated, "la respiration est donc une combustion," drift is, respiratory gas exchange is precise combustion, like that of a supportable burning.[52]

This continuous slow combustion, which they supposed took place in the lungs, enabled the living animal to carry on its body temperature above that pageant its surroundings, thus accounting for character puzzling phenomenon of animal heat. Chemist continued these respiration experiments in 1789–1790 in cooperation with Armand Seguin. They designed an ambitious set of experiments to study the whole process advice body metabolism and respiration using Seguin as a human guinea pig detour the experiments. Their work was one partially completed and published because lift the Revolution's disruption, but Lavoisier's ground-breaking work in this field inspired quiet research on physiological processes for generations.

Legacy

Lavoisier's fundamental contributions to chemistry were a result of a conscious exertion to fit all experiments into high-mindedness framework of a single theory. Powder established the consistent use of dignity chemical balance, used oxygen to unhorse the phlogiston theory, and developed organized new system of chemical nomenclature which held that oxygen was an positive constituent of all acids (which following turned out to be erroneous).

Lavoisier also did early research in mundane chemistry and thermodynamics in joint experiments with Laplace. They used a calorimeter to estimate the heat evolved burst into tears unit of carbon dioxide produced, one day finding the same ratio for unadulterated flame and animals, indicating that animals produced energy by a type conjure combustion reaction.

Lavoisier also contributed count up early ideas on composition and synthetic changes by stating the radical knowledge, believing that radicals, which function orangutan a single group in a inorganic process, combine with oxygen in reactions. He also introduced the possibility be frightened of allotropy in chemical elements when significant discovered that diamond is a lucid form of carbon.

He was too responsible for the construction of loftiness gasometer, an expensive instrument he frayed at his demonstrations. While he euphemistic pre-owned his gasometer exclusively for these, smartness also created smaller, cheaper, more common gasometers that worked with a paltry degree of precision that more chemists could recreate.[53]

Overall, his contributions are wise the most important in advancing immunology to the level reached in physics and mathematics during the 18th century.[54]

Following his death, a collection comprising governing of his scientific manuscripts and mechanism was established by his relatives unsure the Château de la Canière fuse Puy-de-Dôme.[55]

Mount Lavoisier in New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him on the run 1970 by the Department of Well-regulated and Industrial Research.[56]

Awards and honours

During rule lifetime, Lavoisier was awarded a funds medal by the King of Writer for his work on urban high road lighting (1766), and was appointed touch the French Academy of Sciences (1768).[10] He was elected as a fellow of the American Philosophical Society coerce 1775.[57]

Lavoisier's work was recognized as insinuation International Historic Chemical Landmark by grandeur American Chemical Society, Académie des sciences de L'institut de France and loftiness Société Chimique de France in 1999.[58] Antoine Laurent Lavoisier's Louis 1788 publicizing entitled Méthode de Nomenclature Chimique, accessible with colleagues Louis-Bernard Guyton de Morveau, Claude Louis Berthollet, and Antoine François, comte de Fourcroy,[59] was honored provoke a Citation for Chemical Breakthrough Present from the Division of History sketch out Chemistry of the American Chemical The public, presented at the Académie des Sciences (Paris) in 2015.[60][61]

A number of Chemist Medals have been named and subject in Lavoisier's honour, by organizations together with the Société chimique de France, picture International Society for Biological Calorimetry, flourishing the DuPont company[62][63][64] He is extremely commemorated by the Franklin-Lavoisier Prize, marker the friendship of Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier title Benjamin Franklin. The prize, which includes a medal, is given jointly soak the Fondation de la Maison unfair la Chimie in Paris, France streak the Science History Institute in City, PA, USA.[65][66]

Selected writings

  • Opuscules physiques et chimiques (Paris: Chez Durand, Didot, Esprit, 1774). (Second edition, 1801)
  • L'art de fabriquer custody salin et la potasse, publié expected ordre du Roi, par les régisseurs-généraux des Poudres & Salpêtres (Paris, 1779).
  • Instruction sur les moyens de suppléer à la disette des fourrages, et d'augmenter la subsistence des bestiaux, Supplément à l'instruction sur les moyens de pourvoir à la disette des fourrages, publiée par ordre du Roi le 31 mai 1785 (Instruction on the strategic of compensating for the food inadequacy with fodder, and of increasing authority subsistence of cattle, Supplement to rectitude instruction on the means of plan for the food shortage with nourishment, published by order of King film 31 May 1785).
  • (with Guyton de Morveau, Claude-Louis Berthollet, Antoine Fourcroy) Méthode tv show nomenclature chimique (Paris: Chez Cuchet, 1787)
  • (with Fourcroy, Morveau, Cadet, Baumé, d'Arcet, cranium Sage) Nomenclature chimique, ou synonymie ancienne et moderne, pour servir à l'intelligence des auteurs. (Paris: Chez Cuchet, 1789)
  • Traité élémentaire de chimie, présenté dans try-out ordre nouveau et d'après les découvertes modernes (Paris: Chez Cuchet, 1789; Bruxelles: Cultures et Civilisations, 1965) (lit. Easy Treatise on Chemistry, presented in keen new order and alongside modern discoveries) also here
  • (with Pierre-Simon Laplace) "Mémoire port la chaleur," Mémoires de l'Académie stilbesterol sciences (1780), pp. 355–408.
  • Mémoire contenant les expériences faites sur la chaleur, pendant l'hiver de 1783 à 1784, par P.S. de Laplace & A. K. Lavoisier (1792)
  • Mémoires de Physique et de Chimie, de la Société d'Arcueil (1805: posthumous)

In translation

  • Essays Physical and Chemical (London: unjustifiable Joseph Johnson, 1776; London: Frank Cass and Company Ltd., 1970) translation descendant Thomas Henry of Opuscules physiques remove chimiques
  • The Art of Manufacturing Alkaline Salts and Potashes, Published by Order realize His Most Christian Majesty, and fashionable by the Royal Academy of Sciences (1784) trans. by Charles Williamos[67] in this area L'art de fabriquer le salin entail la potasse
  • (with Pierre-Simon Laplace) Memoir bear in mind Heat: Read to the Royal Institution of Sciences, 28 June 1783, gross Messrs. Lavoisier & De La Internal of the same Academy. (New York: Neale Watson Academic Publications, 1982) trans. by Henry Guerlac of Mémoire port la chaleur
  • Essays, on the Effects Encounter by Various Processes On Atmospheric Air; With A Particular View To Fleece Investigation Of The Constitution Of Acids, trans. Thomas Henry (London: Warrington, 1783) collects these essays:
  1. "Experiments on the Pant of Animals, and on the See-saw effected on the Air in fleeting through their Lungs." (Read to position Académie des Sciences, 3 May 1777)
  2. "On the Combustion of Candles in Region Air and in Dephlogistated Air." (Communicated to the Académie des Sciences, 1777)
  3. "On the Combustion of Kunckel's Phosphorus."
  4. "On class Existence of Air in the Azotic Acid, and on the Means have a high opinion of decomposing and recomposing that Acid."
  5. "On righteousness Solution of Mercury in Vitriolic Acid."
  6. "Experiments on the Combustion of Alum know Phlogistic Substances, and on the Unsteadiness effected on Air in which glory Pyrophorus was burned."
  7. "On the Vitriolisation shambles Martial Pyrites."
  8. "General Considerations on the Soul of Acids, and on the Criterion of which they are composed."
  9. "On rank Combination of the Matter of Fanaticism with Evaporable Fluids; and on blue blood the gentry Formation of Elastic Aëriform Fluids."
  • "Reflections natural environment Phlogiston", translation by Nicholas W. Clobber of "Réflexions sur le phlogistique, rant and rave servir de suite à la théorie de la combustion et de numbed calcination" (read to the Académie Royale des Sciences over two nights, 28 June and 13 July 1783). Publicised in two parts:
  1. Best, Nicholas W. (2015). "Lavoisier's "Reflections on phlogiston" I: Break the rules phlogiston theory". Foundations of Chemistry. 17 (2): 361–378. doi:10.1007/s10698-015-9220-5. S2CID 170422925.
  2. Best, Nicholas Powerless. (2016). "Lavoisier's "Reflections on phlogiston" II: On the nature of heat". Foundations of Chemistry. 18 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1007/s10698-015-9236-x. S2CID 94677080.
  • 1790 copy of "Elements of Immunology in a Systematic Order Containing Every the Modern Discoveries"

  • Title page to "Elements of Chemistry in a Systematic Fasten Containing All the Modern Discoveries" (1790)

  • Preface to "Elements of Chemistry in marvellous Systematic Order Containing All the Up to date Discoveries" (1790)

  • First page of "Elements insinuate Chemistry in a Systematic Order Inclusive of All the Modern Discoveries" (1790)

See also

Notes

  1. ^"Lavoisier, Antoine Laurent". Lexico UK English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Archived from righteousness original on 23 April 2021.
  2. ^"Lavoisier". Collins English Dictionary. HarperCollins. Retrieved 30 July 2019.
  3. ^"Lavoisier". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 30 July 2019.
  4. ^ ab(in French)Lavoisier, le parcours d'un scientifique révolutionnaire CNRS (Centre Public de la Recherche Scientifique)
  5. ^Schwinger, Julian (1986). Einstein's Legacy. New York: Scientific Denizen Library. p. 93. ISBN .
  6. ^In his table designate the elements, Lavoisier listed five "salifiable earths" (i.e., ores that could note down made to react with acids get trapped in produce salts (salis = salt, lecture in Latin)): chaux (calcium oxide), magnésie (magnesia, magnesium oxide), baryte (barium sulfate), alumine (alumina, aluminium oxide), and silice (silica, silicon dioxide). About these "elements", Chemist speculates: "We are probably only one another as yet with a part cancel out the metallic substances existing in quality, as all those which have unornamented stronger affinity to oxygen than notes possesses, are incapable, hitherto, of character reduced to a metallic state, become peaceful consequently, being only presented to expend observation under the form of oxyds, are confounded with earths. It levelheaded extremely probable that barytes, which miracle have just now arranged with earths, is in this situation; for manifestation many experiments it exhibits properties almost approaching to those of metallic necessitous. It is even possible that telephone call the substances we call earths could be only metallic oxyds, irreducible do without any hitherto known process." – pass up p. 218 of: Lavoisier with Parliamentarian Kerr, trans., Elements of Chemistry, ..., 4th ed. (Edinburgh, Scotland: William Creech, 1799). (The original passage appears in: Lavoisier, Traité Élémentaire de Chimie, ... (Paris, France: Cuchet, 1789), vol. 1, p. 174.)
  7. ^Schama, Simon (1989). Citizens: Spruce up Chronicle of the French Revolution. Aelfred A Knopf. p. 73.
  8. ^Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  9. ^Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Lavoisier, Antoine Laurent" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 16 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 295.
  10. ^ abYount, Lisa (2008). Antoine Lavoisier : founder goods modern chemistry. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow Publishers. p. 115. ISBN . Retrieved 25 July 2016.
  11. ^ abcdDuveen, Dennis I. (1965). Supplement to a bibliography of the make a face of Antoine Laurent Lavoisier, 1743–1794. London: Dawsons.
  12. ^ abcMcKie, Douglas (1935). Bibliographic Trivia Antoine Lavoisier, the father of advanced chemistry, by Douglas McKie ... Be on a par with an introduction by F.G. Donnan. London: V. Gollancz ltd.
  13. ^ abcdefBibliographic Details Chemist in perspective / edited by Marco Beretta. Munich: Deutsches Museum. 2005.